Legal Opinion
Rogers v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 15, 2006No. 1D06-1455PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
935 So.2d 639 (2006)
Isaac ROGERS, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
No. 1D06-1455.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
August 15, 2006.
Isaac Rogers, pro se, Petitioner.
Charlie Crist, Attorney General, and Elizabeth Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
2Per curiam
Isaac Rogers presents a timely claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. We agree that petitioner's appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to raise an issue of fundamental error in the jury instructions, and therefore grant the petition.
Among other offenses, Rogers was charged…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Braggs v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- Eaton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Debose v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Hodges v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Curls v. FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
4Cited by5 opinions
- Cogbill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Skinner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Curls v. FLORIDA FISH AND WILDLIFE CONSERVATION COMMISSIONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Rogers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- VanWagner v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010