Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Stuart

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided November 25, 1914PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from. Carter Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Settle

— Reversing.

Owing to the numerous transactions injected into the record and the methods of presenting them employed in the pleadings and proof, we have found it difficult to obtain an intelligent conception of the matters in controversy between the parties to this action, but without resorting to unnecessary detail it may be said that the large body of Carter County land, approximating 10,700. acres, constituting the bone of contention in this litigation was originally owned by a corporation called the Lexington & Carter County Mining Company, which,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Richardson v. LinneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1847

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bank of Commerce v. GoolsbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. United States Cast Iron Pipe & Foundry Co. v. Henry Vogt Machine Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  4. Dunscombe v. Amfot Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1923
  5. People's Transit Co. v. Louisville Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API