Legal Opinion

Bank of South Carolina v. Bicknell

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island

Decided June 15, 1858PublishedCited by 1 opinion

[In equity. Bill by the Bank of South Carolina against Bicknell and. Skinner and the Commercial Insurance Company on a policy of insurance. Bill dismissed. Reversed by supreme court in Bank of South Carolina v. Commercial Ins. Co., 17 Lawy. Ed. U. S. Sup. Ct.

Read the full summary

[In equity. Bill by the Bank of South Carolina against Bicknell and. Skinner and the Commercial Insurance Company on a policy of insurance. Bill dismissed. Reversed by supreme court in Bank of South Carolina v. Commercial Ins. Co., 17 Lawy. Ed. U. S. Sup. Ct. Rep. 241.] Bill in equity praying, among other things, that the corporation complainant might be declared entitled to recover the amount of a certain policy of insurance from the corporation defendants, on a quantity of cotton, in the same manner as if the insurance had been effected in their name; that the insurance company might be…

1Opinion of the Court

CLIFFOBD, Circuit Justice.

Marine insur-' anee is a contract whereby one party/' for -a" stipulated sum, undertakes to indemnify the other against loss or damage arising "from certain perils or sea-risks to which his ship, merchandise, or other interest may be exposed during a certain voyage or for a certain period of time. 1 Arn. Ins. p. 2." Like other valid engagements between business men, it requires two parties to make the contract; and as a general rule no person can *676maintain a suit on the policy against the insurers, unless he is named in the instrument, or unless there is some privity…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. De Forest v. Fulton Fire InsuranceThe Superior Court of New York City · 1828

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Russell ex rel. Crucet v. Union InsuranceUnited States Circuit Court · 1806

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API