Legal Opinion

DETROIT & C. RY. v. Michigan RR Comm.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 3, 1916No. 68PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

240 U.S. 564 (1916)

DETROIT AND MACKINAC RAILWAY COMPANY

v.

MICHIGAN RAILROAD COMMISSION AND FLETCHER PAPER COMPANY.

No. 68.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued November 10, 1915.

Decided April 3, 1916.

ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN.

Mr. Fred A. Baker and Mr. James McNamara for plaintiff in error submitted.

Mr. D.H. Crowley, with whom Mr. Grant Fellows and Mr. I.S. Canfield were on the brief, for defendants in error.

2Opinion of the Court · DevanterJustice Van Devanter

This was a petition to the Supreme Court of Michigan by the Railroad Commission of that State for a writ of mandamus to enforce obedience to an order of the…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Weston and Others v. the City Council of CharlestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  3. McPherson v. BlackerSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Mt. Vernon-Woodberry Cotton Duck Co. v. Alabama Interstate Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Davies v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lewis v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1950
  2. Morgan v. Portland Traction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Texas & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API