Legal Opinion

Cutler v. Hartford Life Insurance

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1966PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOliver D. Williams, J.

Defendants move for summary judgment in an action to recover $16,700 as proceeds of insurance coverage issued on the life of plaintiff’s husband, now deceased. Defendants deny any liability, on the ground that the decedent made material misrepresentations of fact in his application for insurance and died within the contestable period. Plaintiff does not take issue with respect to the foregoing claim but asserts that such defense is not available to the defendants, since the application of the decedent containing the alleged misstatements was not attached to any policy or certificate issued…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Layman v. Continental Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Helfaer v. John Hancock Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Bacchi v. Continental Casualty Co.New York Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Blass v. Security Mutual InsuranceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1966
  4. Cutler v. Hartford Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API