Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Neidnig

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 17, 1908PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal" by Richard J. Reidnig, as administrator, etc., from a decree of the Surrogate’s Court of the county of Kings, entered in said Surrogate’s Court on the 26th day of September, 1907.

1Opinion of the Court

Jenks, J.:

This is an appeal from an order of the Surrogate’s Court of Kings county, denying the application of an administrator for a commission to take foreign testimony in proceedings brought to remove him on the ground that lie' is not the son of the intestate, but a bastard; The application sought the testimony of the reputed grandmother, of the reputed aunt of the administrator, and of the burgomaster of the town where the administrator was born, “ or any others to be named in the order.” Proof was submitted in opposition to the application, consisting of transcripts from the records of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. De Brimont v. PennimanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1873
  2. People v. ColgroveNew York Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cox v. PowDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  2. In re NeidnigAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API