Legal Opinion

Christopher v. Saul

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided August 1, 2020No. 3:19-cv-01325Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AMY JOYCE CHRISTOPHER, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:19-CV-01325 v. (MEHALCHICK, M.J.) ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Amy Joyce Christopher brings this action under section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying her application for disability insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act. (Doc. 1). The matter was referred to the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Ethel Burnett v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  5. Joyce A. Rutherford v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API