Legal Opinion

State v. Simms

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1983No. 82AP-254PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCormac, J.

Kathy M. Simms, defendant-appellant, has appealed her conviction by a jury of aggravated robbery asserting the following assignments of error:

1. “It was error to the prejudice of Appellant for the trial Court to permit an accomplice to testify over Appellant’s objection that the State and said accomplice entered into an illegal plea bargain in order to produce such testimony.”

2. “The trial Court’s refusal to permit a defense expert witness to testify concerning the illegality of an accomplice’s plea bargain and thus demonstrate to the jury that her testimony was fatally tainted was a denial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. PriceOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  2. United States v. GobleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
  3. United States v. William L. Riddick and Thomas B. WallaceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BraxtonOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. State v. FergusonOhio Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. State v. LancasterOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. State v. PensonOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API