Legal Opinion

Jennings v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 4, 1926PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranch, J.

Although both the railroad and the box company were named as defendants, the record plainly indicates that the case was tried by the plaintiff primarily as an action against the railroad, and in an effort to fasten liability upon that defendant by showing an unusual operation of the train, the plaintiff described in detail the usual method of shifting cars. He thus asserted a very considerable familiarity with that subject. The verdict against him was fully justified by the evidence of his own lack of due care.

Having failed to charge the railroad upon the strength of the knowledge which he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Collins v. Laconia Car Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1894
  2. O'Hare v. Cocheco Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1901
  3. Fontaine v. Johnson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Fasekis v. J. J. Newbury Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1945
  2. Meersman v. DavisonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  3. Quimby v. ShattuckSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API