Legal Opinion

Honore v. Ludwig

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1933Published

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed March 7, 1933 :

Fairchild, J.

The trial court did not place its order granting a new trial in the field of its discretion, but based *356it upon a legal conclusion that the court “committed reversible error because of the form in which comparative negligence was submitted to the jury.” So we are not concerned with an error granting a new trial by a court moved thereto by reasons appealing to its sound discretion. If the learned trial court did, as a matter of law, correctly submit the questions to the jury, its conclusion based on the reasons stated in its order…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schumaker v. HeinemannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Gherke v. CochranWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API