Legal Opinion
DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. Hurst
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 7, 2007No. 3D06-2593PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
949 So.2d 279 (2007)
DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, Petitioner,
v.
Beatrice HURST, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Kenneth Hurst, et al., Respondents.
No. 3D06-2593.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
February 7, 2007.
Bell & Melamed and Jeffrey M. Bell, Fort Lauderdale, for petitioner.
David M. Lipman and Rebecca S. Shull and Marisol Estevez, Miami; Jonathan Ruckdeschel, Maryland, for respondents.
Ullman, Bursa, Hoffman & Ragano and Daniel S. Green; Fowler, White, Boggs & Banker and Tracy Raffles Gunn, Tampa, for Florida Defense Lawyers Association, as amicus curiae.
Shook,…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Ivey v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. KaklamanosSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. LaforetSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Turner Ex Rel. Turner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- Florida Hosp. Waterman, Inc. v. BusterSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- American Optical Corp. v. SpiewakSupreme Court of Florida · 2011
- Williams v. American Optical Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Weingrad v. MilesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.