Legal Opinion

Barile v. Wright

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 24, 1931PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cardozo, Ch. J.

Plaintiff, an inexperienced woman, unable to speak English, bought a farm from the defendant, giving back a purchase-money mortgage for $12,000, payable to defendant’s wife. In the mortgage was the usual clause (Real Prop. Law; Cons. Laws, ch. 50, § 254, subd. 4) that the mortgagor would keep the buildings insured against loss by fire for the benefit of the mortgagee. One of the policies expired two years thereafter, and the defendant gave notice to the plaintiff to renew it. She told him that she was unable to insure because she was without the needed money, to which he…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hastings v. . Westchester Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Marks v. Nambil Realty Co., Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Siegel v. . Spear Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
  4. Goldstein v. National Liberty Insurance Co. of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  5. Foster v. . Van ReedNew York Court of Appeals · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Fields v. Western Millers Mutual Fire Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
  2. Brown v. PoritzkyNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Olsen v. MadingArizona Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Port Clyde Foods, Inc. v. Holiday Syrups, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  5. Wings & Wheels Express, Inc. v. SisakNew York Supreme Court · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API