Legal Opinion

United States v. Batista

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 10, 2001No. 00 CR. 1296(RWS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMO OPINION

SWEET, District Judge.

Defendant Lenny Batista (“Batista”) has applied for an order directing that he has complied with the bail conditions imposed by the Honorable Andrew J. Peck, Magistrate Judge. Specifically, Batista seeks a ruling to the effect that the government’s decision not to approve three proffered cosigners was arbitrary, and that they be approved. The government opposes the motion on the grounds that the proposed suretors are neither financially responsible nor able to exert moral suasion over Batista. ‘ In the alternative, Batista seeks to have the bail conditions…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. MelvilleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
  2. United States v. GotayDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. HammondDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2002
  2. United States v. ThomasDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API