Jaggers v. Zolliecoffer
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
The appellants are two social workers, employed by the state, who are being sued for violation of the civil rights of the appellees. The action was brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1976) and 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (1976). The appellants moved for summary judgment contending they are “entitled to the defense of absolute immunity or in the alternative qualified immunity, thus barring any recovery by plaintifF[s].” The denial of the summary judgment motion is the subject of this appeal. We must dismiss the appeal because there has been no final or other appealable order as…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Nixon v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Dice v. Akron, Canton & Youngstown RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Robinson v. BeaumontSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987
- West Memphis School District No. 4 v. Circuit Court of Crittenden CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
- Newton v. EtochSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Virden v. RoperSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990
- Davis Nursing Association v. NealSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.