Legal Opinion

Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Stegall's Administratrix

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 21, 1906PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Bristol, in an action on the case. Judgment for the plaintiff. Defendant assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

This action of trespass on the case was brought by the defendant in error to recover damages for the death of her intestate, which is attributed to the negligence of the plaintiff in errur.

There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff in the trial court, and the defendant brings error.

The first assignment of error questions the action of the court in overruling the demurrer to the declaration. The declaration contains two counts, and the demurrer is to the entire declaration and to each count thereof, and is accompanied by a statement in writing of the grounds of demurrer relied on. Ya.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hortenstein v. Virginia-Carolina Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1904
  2. Holland v. SparksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  3. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of Virginia · 1901
  4. Virginia & North Carolina Wheel Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1905
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Rodgers' AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Nance v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  2. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Denny's AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
  3. Nance v. . Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
  4. Lynchburg Traction & Light Co. v. GuillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
  5. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Saunders' AdministratorSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API