Dammann v. Hydraulic Clutch Co.
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Grant Jackson, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
This is an action brought praying for injunctive relief. The second amended complaint, it is claimed, states a cause of action. A demurrer was interposed, was sustained with leave to amend, and plaintiff, having failed to amend within the time allowed, judgment was entered accordingly. The appeal is from the judgment so entered.
Plaintiff alleges that he is the owner of three thousand four hundred shares of the capital stock of the defendant Hydraulic Clutch Company; that said company “has been and now is a corporation duly incorporated and existing under the laws of the state of California’…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. Gold Run Ditch & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by2 opinions
- Padgett v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1929
- Caru Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals v. AnthonyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025