Legal Opinion

Bay Islip Associates v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 7, 2006No. Claim No. 101406PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

In a condemnation proceeding, the claimant appeals, on the ground of inadequacy, and the defendant cross-appeals, on the ground of excessiveness, from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Scuccimarra, J.), dated August 3, 2004, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the claimant and against the defendant in the principal sum of $214,281.

Ordered that the judgment is modified, on the law, by reducing the award to the principal sum of $71,092; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements, and the matter is remitted to the Court of Claims for the entry of an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ossining Urban Renewal Agency v. LordNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Ekorb Associates v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  3. Martabano v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lebov, LLC v. State of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API