Holtzclaw v. Barrett
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.
1. The Civil Code (1910), § 4955, provides, with reference to attorneys at law: “They have authority to bind their clients in any action or proceeding, by any agreement in relation to the-eause, made in writing, and in signing judgments, entering appeals, and by an entry of such matters, when permissible, on the dockets of the court; but they can not take affidavits required of their clients, unless specially permitted by law.” Accordingly, a pauper affidavit filed by the plaintiff in error, and witnessed by a notary public who is the attorney representing the plaintiff in error, is void. See…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Nichols v. HamptonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872
- Moultrie Lumber Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Wilkowski v. HalleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1868
3Cited by1 opinion
- Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1937