Legal Opinion

Nixon v. Johnson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1965No. 9527PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

On January 16, 1962, W. W. Nixon, plaintiff-respondent, initiated this action to partition certain unimproved farm land in Boundary County, hereinafter referred to as allotments 36 and 37. Nixon alleged that he and the defendants-respondents are tenants in common on the land. All parties claim possession through one Wayne Tucker, a lessee under a written lease for each allotment which lease was executed by the defendants and the Superintendent of Indian Field Service on behalf of respondents’ predecessor and minors and absentee heirs, as the lessors. The land involved had…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Moore v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. Lee v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  3. United States v. State Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. Arenas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
  5. Firato v. TuttleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ralls v. FourakerIdaho Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API