Legal Opinion
Mixon v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC
District Court, S.D. Alabama
Decided December 2, 2014No. Civil Action No. 14-0238-WS-BPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
WILLIAM H. STEELE, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the plaintiffs’ motion to remand. (Doc. 6). The defendant has filed a response and the plaintiffs a reply, (Docs. 12, 13), and the motion is ripe for resolution.1 After careful consideration, the Court concludes the motion to remand is due to be granted.
BACKGROUND
The plaintiffs filed suit in state court alleging that the defendant, as the assign-ee of their mortgage, has refused to accept bi-monthly mortgage payments even though the mortgage specifically provides for them. Based on its improper refusal to accept their…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Andrew Pretka v. Kolter City Plaza II, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Cheryl Cohen, on Behalf of Herself and Others Similarly Situated v. Office Depot, Inc., a Florida CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
- Roe v. Michelin North America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- Bonilla v. Baker Concrete Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Baugh v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2018
- Hartung v. PHH Mortgage CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2021