Legal Opinion

Pardoe & Graham Real Estate, Inc. v. Schulz Homes Corp.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 3, 2000No. Record 990531PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Keenan

In this appeal, we consider whether the statute of frauds barred a real estate brokerage firm from recovering damages for breach of an oral contract for a commission on the sale of a custom home to be constructed on a lot already owned by the home buyer.

Schulz Homes Corporation (Schulz), a residential construction contractor, filed a motion for judgment against Pardoe & Graham Real Estate, Inc. (Pardoe), a real estate brokerage firm. Schulz alleged that Pardoe intentionally interfered with Schulz’s contractual relationship with Lake Manassas Limited Partnership (the developer), and prevented…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hastings v. MatlockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  2. McCaffrey v. StrainerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Patel v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  2. Carr v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nHopewell County Circuit Court · 2013
  3. Baker v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2006
  4. Patel v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2012
  5. Upen G. Patel and Avanti D. Patel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API