Legal Opinion

Inquiry Into the Conduct of the Honorable Stacey

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 23, 2007No. A06-0305PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The Honorable Rex D. Stacey, Judge of District Court, challenges the recommendation of the Minnesota Board of Judicial Standards that he receive a public reprimand and be fined $3,000 for his ex parte handling of a traffic ticket belonging to the husband of an administrative clerk employed by the judicial district. We publicly reprimand Judge Stacey for his handling of the traffic ticket, but decline to impose a civil penalty.

On May 21, 2004, the husband of one of the senior clerks in the Dakota County Court Administrator’s Office received a petty misdemeanor citation for driving after…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint Concerning MieraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. In Re Complaint Concerning Judge McDonoughSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  3. In Re MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. WilsonKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Inquiry Into the Conduct of the Honorable StaceySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
  4. Inquiry into the Conduct of the Honorable MurphySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API