Legal Opinion

General Electric Capital Corp. v. Nunziata

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 14, 2013No. 2D13-422PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CASANUEVA, Judge.

General Electric Capital Corp. (GECC) has filed a petition for a writ of certiorari, challenging the trial court’s order denying its motion for a protective order from a subpoena duces tecum. We grant the petition, concluding that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of the law, causing material injury throughout the remainder of the proceedings below, and effectively leaving no adequate remedy on appeal by requiring GECC to divulge extensive business records that are related to the underlying action in a rarely seen tenuous manner. We have jurisdiction.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Briggs v. SalcinesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  2. Jim Appley's Tru-Arc, Inc. v. LIQUID EXT. SYS. LTD. P'SHIPDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  3. Jerry's South, Inc. v. MorranDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Palmer v. ServisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Walter v. PageDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. 2245 Venetian Court Building 4, Inc. v. HarrisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. General Electric Capital Corp. v. ShattuckDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  3. Winderting Investments, LLC v. FurnellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. Inglis v. CasselberryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  5. ANITA TALLO v. PETER ILLESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API