Legal Opinion
Industrial Companies, Inc. v. Durbin
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 28, 2001No. 2000 CA 2170PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
J^FITZSIMMONS, Judge.
This appeal follows the district court’s sustaining of a peremptory exception based on no right and no cause of action. We reverse the lower court and remand *108for further proceedings in accordance with this judgment.
Petitioner, Industrial Companies, Inc. (Industrial), was the holder in due course of two promissory notes secured by three collateral mortgage notes executed by Albert A. Connell, Sr. and Lillian J. Connell. James E. Durbin and Berkley R. Durbin, attorneys practicing law as Durbin and Durbin, L.L.C. (collectively Durbin), were retained as legal counsel by…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Central Progressive Bank v. BradleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- TREASURE CHEST v. Parish of JeffersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
- Foundation Finance Co. v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- Home Distrib. v. Dollar AmusementLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Sivils v. MitchellLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Industrial Companies, Inc. v. DurbinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003