Legal Opinion

Opinion No. Oag 2-88, (1988)

Wisconsin Attorney General Reports

Decided January 11, 1988Published

1Opinion of the Court

PHILIP J. FREEBURG, District Attorney Langlade County

You have requested my opinion on several issues relating to the timeliness of and standards for staying the evidentiary hearing afforded to individuals who have requested the opportunity to litigate the lawfulness of their refusal to submit to chemical testing under the implied consent law. Sec. 343.305, Stats. Paraphrasing your questions, you ask:

1. When should the refusal hearing be held?

2. Can the refusal hearing be stayed until after the trial on the substantive operating while intoxicated ("OWI") charge?

3. If the refusal hearing can be…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API