Legal Opinion · Dissent

Moore v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 12, 2015No. 1140643Published

1DissentShaw, Justice

In the instant matter, the State of Alabama petitions this Court for certiorari review of the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals in Moore v. State, 183 So.3d 1000 (Ala.Crim.App.2014), reversing Phillip Allen Moore’s conviction for menacing. For the reasons discussed below, I dissent from denying the State’s petition.

The crime of “menacing” is statutorily defined as follows: “A person commits the crime of menacing if, by physical action, he intentionally places or attempts to place another person in fear of imminent serious physical injury.” Ala.Code 1975, § 13A-6-23(a). The main…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jones v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  2. Willis v. BuchmanAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  3. Pate v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  4. KGS STEEL, INC. v. McINISHCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  5. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API