Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Bobby Bland v. B. Roberts

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided September 18, 2013No. 12-1671Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partEllen Lipton Hollander, District Judge

I concur in Chief Judge Trader’s excellent opinion, with one exception. The majority concludes that, at the relevant time, “a reasonable sheriff could have believed he had the right to choose not to reappoint his sworn deputies for political reasons,” Maj. Op. at 391, and, on this basis, it determines that Sheriff Roberts is protected by qualified immunity with respect to his discharge of Carter, Dixon, and McCoy. In my view, when these deputies were discharged in December 2009, the law was clearly established that a sheriffs deputy with the job duties of a jailer could not be fired on the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Reichle v. HowardsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API