Legal Opinion

Stefonick v. Stefonick

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1946No. 8607PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

Defendant has appealed from an order fixing counsel fees and costs to be paid by him to plaintiff on the appeal by him from the judgment in plaintiff’s favor, which appeal is numbered 8572 in this court, 167 Pac. (2d) 848.

The order which was made upon plaintiff’s petition fixed attorney’s fees in the sum of $2,500 and costs in the sum of $310.

Defendant contends that the court erred in making the order for three reasons. One reason urged by defendant is that the main action for divorce is not being prosecuted by plaintiff in good faith. The outcome of the appeal in the main action, No. 8572,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In the Matter of EldridgeNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Falk v. FalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. Lacrabere v. WiseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Stefonick v. StefonickMontana Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Cornelison v. CornelisonIdaho Supreme Court · 1933

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. LangfordMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Saturnini v. SaturniniSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. Stefonick v. StefonickMontana Supreme Court · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API