Legal Opinion

Bruntz v. State

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1940No. 30683PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnsen, J.

Jacob Bruntz was convicted of assault with intent to commit robbery and brings error.

*566The principal question arises out of the county attorney’s comment upon defendant’s failure to testify. In his argument to the jury he said: “The defendant does not get on the stand to tell you about this case.” The trial court immediately admonished the county attorney and instructed the jury to disregard his remark.

Section 29-2011, Comp. St. 1929, provides that the refusal or neglect of an accused to testify shall not create any presumption against him, “nor shall any reference be made to, nor any comment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hardesty v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. IrwinNebraska Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Pierce v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1962
  3. State v. BrooksNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
  4. State v. DavisNebraska Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State v. DonaldNebraska Supreme Court · 1977

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API