Legal Opinion
Clements v. Powell
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided March 3, 1923No. 3144PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Per curiam
1. The proposal of the amendment to the constitution as contained in the act of 1919 (Acts 1919, p. 68), as amended by the act of 1920 (Acts 1920, p. 45), is not void as being in conflict with the constitution of Georgia as contained in art. 13, secs. 1 and 2, par. 1 (Civil Code of 1910, §§ 6610, 6612).(a) These sections of the constitution do not make it essential that the acts of the General Assembly shall contain any provision for the manner in which the Governor shall submit the same for ratification or rejection. Nor does the constitution prescribe the details relating to the manner of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hammond v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Cooney v. FooteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- Griffin v. SissonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- McMillan v. TuckerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
- Ewing v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- McLennan v. AldredgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
- McLucas v. State Bridge Building AuthoritySupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
- City of Calhoun v. North Georgia Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Dejarnette v. Hospital Authority of AlbanySupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Steadham v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1968
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.