Legal Opinion

Selectmen of Natick v. Boston & Albany Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided November 6, 1911PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Bill in equity, filed in the Superior Court on June 13, 1910, under St. 1908, e.'552, § 2, by the selectmen of the town of Natick to compel the Boston and Albany Railroad Company to repair the hard pine under floor of a bridge over the tracks of the railroad of that corporation at North Main Street in Natick, in compliance with the terms of St. 1906, c. 463, Part I, § 38, relating to the maintenance and repair of bridges constructed under proceedings for the abolition of a…

Read the full summary

Bill in equity, filed in the Superior Court on June 13, 1910, under St. 1908, e.'552, § 2, by the selectmen of the town of Natick to compel the Boston and Albany Railroad Company to repair the hard pine under floor of a bridge over the tracks of the railroad of that corporation at North Main Street in Natick, in compliance with the terms of St. 1906, c. 463, Part I, § 38, relating to the maintenance and repair of bridges constructed under proceedings for the abolition of a grade crossing under that statute. The case was heard by Richardson, J. The facts appeared in ■ evidence which are stated…

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

This is a suit in equity brought by the selectmen of Natick under St. 1908, c. 552, § 2. The question presented is the meaning of the words of St. 1906, c. 463, Part I, § 38, as to the apportionment between the railroad and the town of the cost of maintenance of a bridge by which a highway spans the tracks of a railroad, built in pursuance of a grade crossing abolition. The physical facts of importance are that this bridge consists of main girders extending from abutment to abutment, which ultimately bore the entire weight of the bridge; across these were six floor beams; directly supported…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Browne v. TurnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  3. Leary v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
  4. Federal Insurance v. GilmourMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Department of Public WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Town of Needham v. Winslow Nurseries, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  3. Allen v. Commissioner of Corporations & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  4. Flagg v. Inhabitants of ConcordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. Berke Moore Co. v. Phoenix Bridge Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1953

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API