Legal Opinion

New Mexico Department of Health v. Compton

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 2001No. 26,419PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SERNA, Chief Justice.

{1} Respondent-Petitioner Fred Compton seeks review of an opinion of the Court of Appeals, arguing that the New Mexico Department of Health (the Department) failed to provide him with a civil commitment hearing within the time limits mandated by NMSA 1978, § 43-1-11(A) (1989) and NMSA 1978, § 43-l-15(B) (1993, prior to 1999 amendment). Compton requests that this Court hold that the statutory time periods should be strictly construed and enforced and that the petitions against him should have been dismissed. We affirm.

I. Facts and Background

{2} Compton was…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  4. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Delfino v. GriffoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. JonesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  3. City of Albuquerque Ex Rel. Albuquerque Police Department v. One (1) 1984 White Chevy Ut., VIN 1G8CS18BXE8176575, New Mexico License No. 335-KRHNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  4. In Re the Necessity for the Hospitalization of Gabriel C.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
  5. National Union of Hospital & Health Care Employees District No. 1199 v. Board of RegentsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API