Legal Opinion

Mauser v. Friesco Realty Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 15, 1930PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff for the relief demanded in the complaint and dismissing defendant’s counterclaim upon the merits, with costs. The restrictive covenants of record affecting the premises described in the complaint are an incumbrance upon the title which justified the rejection of the title by the plaintiff. (Kimball Co. v. Fox, 120 Misc. 701; affd., 209 App. Div. 812; affd., 239 N. Y. 554; Isaacs v. Schmuck, 245 id. 77; Van Vliet & Place, Inc., v. Gaines, 249 id. 106; Calleran v. Gallen, 219 App. Div. 801; Ginsburg v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kimball Company v. FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. A. Kimball Co. v. FoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
  3. A. Kimball, Co. v. FoxNew York Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Calleran v. GallenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rosenberg v. Centre Davis Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API