Catchings v. Florida-McCracken Concrete Pipe Co.
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, P.J.
A writ of error was taken to the following: “The Court having directed a verdict for Defendant herein on December 20th, and said Jury having returned a verdict for Defendant, judgment is hereby rendered herein for the Defendant above named.”
This may be regarded as an order that an appropriate judgment for the defendant be duly entered but it is not such a final judgment as will support a writ of error. The words, “judgment is hereby rendered herein for the defendant” are not the equivalent of words that the plaintiff “take nothing by his suit, and that the defendant go hence without day” or…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Flynn-Harris-Bullard Co. v. HamptonSupreme Court of Florida · 1915
- Pensacola Bank & Trust Co. v. National BankSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
- Milteer v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1913
- Himes Supply Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
- Mitchell v. St. Petersburg & Gulf Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Russell v. RussellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
- Monticello Ins. Co. v. ThompsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Renard v. Kirkeby HotelsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
- Arcangeli v. Albertson's, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Baker v. ColleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.