Williams v. Moore
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Lawrence Circuit Court, Eastern District ; John B. McCaleb, Special Judge; 1. The signed order and note, dated January 5,1913, left it optional with appellee to fill the same.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Lawrence Circuit Court, Eastern District ; John B. McCaleb, Special Judge; 1. The signed order and note, dated January 5,1913, left it optional with appellee to fill the same. Until he accepted same .and bound himself to fill it, there was no contract. 47 Ark. 519; 90 Ark. 131; Id. 184; 97 Ark. 613; 95 Ark. 421; 100 Ark. 510. 2. Until the order had been 'accepted, though it contained a condition that same was not subject to countermand, it could be countermanded. 96 Ark. 616; 110 Ark. 128; 98 Ark. 621. 3. Appellee has shown no damages that he could recover. Appellee could not…
1Opinion of the CourtMcCulloch, C. J.
This is an action on a promissory note executed for the price of a monument. Plaintiff Moore is engaged in manufacturing and selling monuments ¡and 'tombstones at Poplar Bluff, Mo., land the defendant Williams, who resides at Walnut Ridge, Ark., entered into a contract with plaintiff for the preparation of a monument to be erected at the grave of defendant’s wife at Walnut Ridge. The order for the monument, and specifications- and details concerning its preparation, were set forth in writing as a part of the promissory note executed for the price. The -order for the monument was made through…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Moore v. Camden Marble & Granite WorksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906