Johnson v. Rush County Division of Family & Children
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DARDEN, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Harold Johnson appeals the trial court’s termination of the parent-child relationship with his daughters, A. and T. We affirm.
*718 ISSUES
1. Whether the trial court erred in failing to appoint counsel for Harold before the Rush County Division of Family and Children presented its case in chief in a hearing for which Harold failed to appear.
2. Whether there is sufficient evidence to support the termination of the parental relationship.
FACTS
Harold and Melissa Johnson were married in Apiril 1989. Their daughter A. was born in May 1989, and their daughter T.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Egly v. Blackford County Department of Public WelfareIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of J.K.C. v. Fountain County Department of Public WelfareIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Browning v. WaltersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Matter of MBIndiana Court of Appeals · 1996
- J.L.L. v. Madison County Department of Public WelfareIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Matter of ANJIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re Adoption of GWBIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- Brooks v. McGeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
- CHINS: B B v. Indiana Department of Child ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2025
- In Re The Involuntary Termination of the Parent-Child Relationship of E.M., G.M., and L.M.: B.M. v. The Indiana Department of Child ServicesIndiana Court of Appeals · 2013
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.