Legal Opinion
Conrad v. Smith
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided January 9, 1986No. 6717-3-IIIPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
—Dorothy Conrad appeals the dismissal of her claims for violation of the federal Truth in Lending Act and the Washington State Usury Act in a summary judgment proceeding. We affirm.
In 1981, Frank and Dorothy Conrad obtained a $5,250 loan from Pacific Security Companies, using their home as security. The Conrads executed a Certificate of Business Purpose stating the loan was for commercial purposes. The Conrads defaulted and foreclosure proceedings were initiated; a trustee's sale was set for November 26, 1982. On October 7, 1982, Mr. Conrad contacted Consumer Loan Services (CLS), a loan…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hartley v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- LaPlante v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Ella Tower v. Paralee Moss, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant v. Home Construction Company of Mobile, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Curtis Thorns and Josie Thorns v. Sundance Properties, a Nevada PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- Toy National Bank of Sioux City v. McGarrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pacesetter Real Estate, Inc. v. FasulesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
- Dawson v. Thomas (In Re Dawson)District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Brown v. GigerWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Westbank v. MaurerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Brown v. GigerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.