Legal Opinion

Collier v. Connelly

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1860PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Putnam Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtHanna, J.

Suit by Oonnelly, assignee, on a promissory nóte, which is averred to have been executed to Mary Góók, and by her assigned to the plaintiff. The copy of the note also purports to have indorsed thereon the name of Joseph Ooole. There is no averment showing the relation which he sustained. One paragraph of the answer alleges, that at the time of the attempted assignment, said Mary was, and continued to be, a married woman; that her husband should have joined, &c., and not having done so, that he and said Mary should have been made defendants. Reply to this paragraph. 1. A denial; 2. That Joseph…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scott v. ScottIndiana Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Paulman v. ClaycombIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Mathes v. ShankIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Moreau v. BransonIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Smith v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Walton v. . BristolSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API