Thompson v. Boekhout
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Edgcomb, J. (dissenting).
On January 2, 1936, the defendant Townsend, president of the local union, presented to the plaintiff for his signature a proposed agreement, which provided in substance that the plaintiff would employ only moving picture operators supplied by the union, and would pay each operator not less than forty-nine dollars per week. The defendant Moyer, a member of the union,'was employed by the plaintiff at the time, and was receiving thirty-five dollars a week. Plaintiff’s theatre was a small one, and drew its patronage from the surrounding neighborhood. The receipts were…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Matter of Berkovitz v. . Arbib HoulbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Exchange Bakery & Restaurant, Inc. v. RifkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Backus v. Fort Street Union Depot Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Hanna v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Wiley v. . Solvay Process Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.