Legal Opinion
Brayton Purcell LLP v. Recordon & Recordon
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 18, 2005No. C-04-4995 EMCPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TRANSFER OF VENUE (Docket No. 14).
CHEN, United States Magistrate Judge.
On November 24, 2004, Plaintiff Brayton Purcell LLP, a law firm with its principal place of business in Novato, California, filed suit against Defendant Recordon & Recordon (hereinafter referred to as “R & R”), a small law firm operating solely in San Diego, California. R & R allegedly copied the entire text of Brayton Purcell’s website and incorporated the text into R & R’s own website. The claims asserted by Brayton…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Amini Innovation Corp. v. JS IMPORTS INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2007
- IO Group, Inc. v. JordonDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Brackett v. HILTON HOTELS CORPORATIONDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Hofbruhaus of America. LLC v. Oak Tree Management Services, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2023
- Sadasivan v. EmmelDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023