Legal Opinion

Brueggestradt v. Ludwig

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 22, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Bill of Foreclosure.—Appeal from a decree of the Superior Court of Cook County; the Hon. Theodore Brentxno, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1898.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice "Windes,

after making the above statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

A thorough examination of the master’s report, the exceptions thereto, and the evidence, in the light of counsels’arguments, lead us to the conclusion the master’s report, that there was no fraud in reference to the two trust deeds sought to be foreclosed, is not sustained by the evidence, and that the findings of fact made by the chancellor, the substance of which is contained in the statement preceding this opinion, are in the main correct, and also that the decree, except as will be stated…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Olds v. CummingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Peoria & Springfield Railroad v. ThompsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Montgomery v. PickeringMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  4. Keohane v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  5. McIntire v. YatesIllinois Supreme Court · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Munnis v. Northern Hotel Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  2. Maas v. BoneszAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API