Ruggiero v. United States
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CAPUTO, District Judge.
Before me is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Doc. 7.) Resolution of this motion turns on whether the so-called Feres doctrine, Feres v. United States, 340 U.S. 135, 71 S.Ct. 153, 95 L.Ed. 152 (1950), bars recovery under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 5 U.S.C. § 8101, et seq. Despite the harsh result given this grave tragedy, I am constrained by stare decisis to hold that the Feres doctrine applies and deprives the Court of jurisdiction. Accordingly,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Gould Electronics Inc., F/k/a Gould Inc. American Premier Underwriters, Inc. v. United States of America Gould Electronics Inc. American Premier Underwriters, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- United States v. ShearerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.