Legal Opinion

Smith v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided June 13, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hart, C. J.,

(after stating the facts). It is the settled law of this State that one who asks to be relieved from a judgment on the ground of unavoidable casualty preventing the defendant from making a defense to the action, the party asking to be relieved from the judgment must show merit; otherwise the court would be asked to do the vain thing of setting aside a judgment when it would be its duty to enter again the same judgment upon a re-trial of the case. It is not required of the defendant to establish his case conclusively-, but he must make out a prima facie defénse, the- final…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Illinois Bankers' Life Association v. ByasseeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
  2. Queen of Arkansas Insurance v. LasterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
  3. McDonald Land Co. v. Shapleigh Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
  4. Halliday v. FentonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lambie v. W. T. Rawleigh Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  2. Rural Special School District No. 22 v. McCrory Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  3. Lambie v. W. T. Rawleigh Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  4. Quirles v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1933
  5. Rural Sp. Sch. Dist. 22 v. McCrory Sp. Sch. Dist.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API