Legal Opinion

Wachovia Bank of Delaware, National Ass'n v. Gilliam

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 2007No. 05-0903PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Per curiam

When a default judgment is challenged by restricted appeal, there are no presumptions in favor of valid service. See Fid. & Guar. Ins. Co. v. Drewery Const. Co., 186 S.W.3d 571, 573 (Tex.2006). In this case, substituted service was based on statutes requiring papers to be forwarded to the defendant’s “home office” or “principal office,” but nothing in the record shows they were. As the court of appeals erred by presuming otherwise, we reverse.

In April 2001, Patsy Fowler obtained a $44,000 home-equity loan from First Union National Bank of Delaware. As required by the Constitution, Fowler had…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. George Alexander D/B/A Zentner's Daughter Steakhouse v. Lynda's BoutiqueTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Primate Construction, Inc. v. SilverTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. McKanna v. EdgarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Uvalde Country Club v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Fidelity & Guaranty Insurance Co. v. Drewery Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2006

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Hubicki v. FestinaTexas Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Lytle v. Cunningham, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2008
  3. John L. Dole, III & Celia E. Dole v. Lsref2 Apex 2, Llc, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2014
  4. MC Phase II Owner, LLC v. TI Shopping Center, LLCCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  5. AEP Engineering & Consulting, Inc. D/B/A Texas Conveyors v. SICK, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2010

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API