Legal Opinion

United States v. Garrity

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided May 20, 2016No. 3:15-cv-243 (MPS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Michael P. Shea, United States District Judge.

Plaintiff, the U.S. Government (the “Government”), brought this action to collect an outstanding' civil penalty from the Estate of Paul G. Garrity, Sr. (the “Estate”). (ECF No. 1.) Defendants Diane M. Garrity, Paul G. Garrity, Jr., and Paul M. Sterczala, fiduciaries of the Estate, move to amend the scheduling order in this case to extend the deadline to amend pleadings and allow them to assert a counterclaim. (ECF No. 40.) Because the Court finds that the Estate cannot, under the circumstances of this case, -invoke the damages…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. McCarthy v. Dun & Bradstreet Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  4. Lane v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Guancione v. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023
  2. Owens v. ConnecticutDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
  3. Patel v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2021
  4. Smith v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API