Cronin v. O'Reiley
Superior Court of Buffalo
Motion to vacate an order. Action by Patrick Cronin against Dennis F. O’Beiley. Plaintiff moves to vacate an order removing the receiver appointed in the action, granted upon motion of defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtHatch, J.
This action is brought for the dissolution of a partnership heretofore existing between the parties to it, and for the appointment of a receiver. The action was commenced in 1885. The firm of Green, McMillan & Gluck appeared therein as attorneys for the defendant. In February, 1886, the law firm of Shire & Van Peyma was duly substituted as attorneys for defendant in place of said first-named firm. They have ever since remained, and are now, the attorneys of record. On the 1st day of October, 1886, Moses Shire, the senior member of the last-named firm, was duly appointed clerk of this court,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of the Application of Cooper, Etc.New York Court of Appeals · 1883
- In Re Proving the Alleged Last Will & Testament of HathawayNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Howard v. SextonCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1845
- White v. . CoulterNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Saxton v. DodgeNew York Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by1 opinion
- Commercial Laundry, Inc. v. Linen Supply Ass'n of Greater New York, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950