Legal Opinion
Bank of Taft v. Thompson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 14, 1911No. 1478PublishedCited by 2 opinions
Mrror from District Court,, Muskogee County; John H. King, Judge. Action between the Bank of Taft and William Thompson and Walter Dills. From the judgment, the Bank of Taft brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.
This cause comes on to be heard upon motion of the defendants in error to dismiss the appeal, for the reason that the plaintiff in error has failed to observe rule 7 of this court (30 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) in not filing briefs within the required time. An examination of the record shows, that the plaintiff in error is in default in regard to filing briefs, although the time for doing so has expired.
' The motion to dismiss must be sustained.
TURNER, C. J., and DUNN and HAYES, JJ., concur; WILLIAMS, J., absent.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Simmer v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Turner v. HuffstetlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912