Legal Opinion

Heroux v. Katt

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided August 18, 1949PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFlynn, C. J.

This action in trespass and ejectment was brought by a lessee for years to obtain possession of a portion of the demised premises alleged to be occupied by the defendants and wrongfully detained by them from the plaintiff. In the superior court, at the conclusion of the evidence for the plaintiff, the defendants rested their case and each party then moved for a directed verdict. The trial justice granted the plaintiff’s motion and denied that of the defendants. The case is before us on defendants’ exception to each of these rulings, all other exceptions being waived.

The following undisputed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Butler v. . Frontier Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Wachstein v. ChristopherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
  3. McCourt v. EcksteinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867
  4. Murphy v. BolgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1888
  5. Fisher v. GoodmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davis v. WestphalMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Sproles v. McDonaldNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Butterfly Realty v. Romanella SonsSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2011
  4. Val-Gioia Properties v. BlamiresSuperior Court of Rhode Island · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API