Legal Opinion
Transportation Insurance v. Desena
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 11, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 75 to permanently stay arbitration of a claim for uninsured/underinsured motorist benefits, Ronald Desena appeals from an order of the Supreme *479Court, Nassau County (Brandveen, J.), entered May 26, 2004, which denied his motion to dismiss the proceeding, granted the petition, and permanently stayed arbitration.
Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, and the proceeding is dismissed as time-barred.
The claimant seeks uninsured motorist benefits or “supplemental uninsured motorist insurance,” which is colloquially…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re the Arbitration Between Steck & State Farm InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- In Re the Arbitration Between Blamowski & Munson Transportation, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- S'Dao v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Nationwide Insurance v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- New Hampshire Indemnity Co. v. VranicaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Government Employees Insurance v. Castillo-GomezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Standard Fire Insurance v. MouchetteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. CastroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007