Legal Opinion

Beekman v. Bost

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1921No. 21705PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from chancery court of Adams county. Hon. R. W. Cutres., Chancellor. Action by R. E. Bost against P.. Beekman and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal. On motion to discharge supersedeas or require supersedeas bond in double the sum of the judgment. Supersedeas discharged unless bond in double amount of judgment given. No brief of counsel found in the record.

1Opinion of the CourtEthridge, J.

The appellants seek to appeal from a judgment in favor of Bost against them and the Bose Hill Baptist Church, the suit being one to condemn and sell property to satisfy a judgment against the Rose Hill Baptist Church, and the contention of the appellants is that the property was the property of the appellants and not of the Baptist Church.

The decreed from which the appeal is prosecuted is for two thousand three hundred twenty-five dollars, and the same is fixed by the decree of the court below as a charge upon the real estate which is worth five thousand dollars. The chancellor allowed a…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Aetna Ins. v. RobertsonMississippi Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Evans v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API